Bug 126643
Summary: | Cannot install i386 qt on xmu86_64 system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bryan O'Sullivan <bos> |
Component: | qt | Assignee: | Than Ngo <than> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2 | CC: | rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-06-29 11:20:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bryan O'Sullivan
2004-06-24 05:31:41 UTC
It's a correct behavior of rpm. the qt for x86_64 and i386 cannot be installed coexistent. /usr/bin/qtconfig caused a file conflict, because it's already included in another rpm! I'm sorry, but this sounds quite bogus. If that's the case, it makes it impossible to run any 32-bit qt apps on an x86_64 box. The correct thing to do is either fix the qt RPM so this conflict doesn't occur or split qt into a qt-libs and qt package, so that it's possible to run 32-bit apps on a 64-bit machine. Ignoring the problem is not a correct approach, I believe. it's fixed in 1:3.3.2-9, it allows now multilib installation. |