Bug 1266586 (TEIID-3362)

Summary:	Add the new system procedure ARRAYITERATE to Data Virtualization
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Data Virtualization 6	Reporter:	dsteigne
Component:	Teiid	Assignee:	jolee
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Filip Elias <felias>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2.0	CC:	shawkins, vhalbert
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-09-29 14:57:44 UTC	Type:	Support Patch
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description dsteigne 2015-09-25 17:52:45 UTC

Description of problem:
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3362

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
DV 6.2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Steven Hawkins 2015-09-25 18:47:09 UTC

Specifically to support the case of searching in an array, it could be better to add a system function, such as array_contains(array, val) or array_index(array, val) since those could also be pushed down.

Comment 3 Van Halbert 2015-09-26 12:34:05 UTC

Debbie,

Since you made this a blocker for the DV 6.2 patch, I've changed this to a support patch and assigned to John.

Comment 4 Steven Hawkins 2015-09-27 12:51:19 UTC

To reiterate more strongly, if the customer case is specifically to support searching in an array, then it would make more sense to introduce a targeted function, rather than pursuing a back port of a general construct.

Comment 6 JBoss JIRA Server 2016-01-27 13:18:43 UTC

Steven Hawkins <shawkins> updated the status of jira TEIID-3362 to Closed