Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1266586 (TEIID-3362)

Summary: Add the new system procedure ARRAYITERATE to Data Virtualization
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Data Virtualization 6 Reporter: dsteigne
Component: TeiidAssignee: jolee
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Filip Elias <felias>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2.0CC: shawkins, vhalbert
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-29 14:57:44 UTC Type: Support Patch
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description dsteigne 2015-09-25 17:52:45 UTC 
Description of problem:
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3362

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
DV 6.2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Steven Hawkins 2015-09-25 18:47:09 UTC 
Specifically to support the case of searching in an array, it could be better to add a system function, such as array_contains(array, val) or array_index(array, val) since those could also be pushed down.
Comment 3 Van Halbert 2015-09-26 12:34:05 UTC 
Debbie,

Since you made this a blocker for the DV 6.2 patch, I've changed this to a support patch and assigned to John.
Comment 4 Steven Hawkins 2015-09-27 12:51:19 UTC 
To reiterate more strongly, if the customer case is specifically to support searching in an array, then it would make more sense to introduce a targeted function, rather than pursuing a back port of a general construct.
Comment 6 JBoss JIRA Server 2016-01-27 13:18:43 UTC 
Steven Hawkins <shawkins> updated the status of jira TEIID-3362 to Closed