Bug 1266940
| Summary: | sssd-client.i686 on x86_64 has unowned directories | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
| Component: | sssd | Assignee: | Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | abokovoy, jhrozek, lslebodn, orion, pbrezina, preichl, rharwood, sbose, ssorce |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | sssd-1.13.3-3.fc23 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc22 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-01-25 02:21:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Orion Poplawski
2015-09-28 15:28:13 UTC
I would like to apologize for late reply.
I was able to install sssd-client.i686 after installing sssd-client.x86_64. I also did not see any problem in yum/dnf install output.
I would like to ask what do you mean by "file /usr/lib/cifs-utils is not owned by any package". It is not a file it's a directory.
If you mean "rpm --query --file" then neither 32 bit nor 64 bit version is owned by any package.
[root@host ~]# rpm --query --file /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/ /usr/lib*/sssd/modules/
file /usr/lib64/cifs-utils is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/cifs-utils is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib64/sssd/modules is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/sssd/modules is not owned by any package
But files in these directories are owned by correct packages.
[root@host ~]# rpm --query --file /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/cifs* \
/usr/lib*/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5*
sssd-client-1.13.0-7.fc23.x86_64
sssd-client-1.13.0-7.fc23.i686
sssd-client-1.13.0-7.fc23.x86_64
sssd-client-1.13.0-7.fc23.i686
BTW directory are not owned by any package even with 64 bit version of sssd-client. Could you describe what is the problem? [root@host ~]# rpm --query --file /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/ /usr/lib*/sssd/modules/ file /usr/lib64/cifs-utils is not owned by any package file /usr/lib64/sssd/modules is not owned by any package [root@host ~]# rpm --query --file /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/cifs* /usr/lib*/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5* sssd-client-1.13.0-4.fc22.x86_64 sssd-client-1.13.0-4.fc22.x86_64 [root@host ~]# ls -l /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/cifs* /usr/lib*/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 10912 Sep 10 14:58 /usr/lib64/cifs-utils/cifs_idmap_sss.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 27880 Sep 10 14:58 /usr/lib64/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5_localauth_plugin.so Every file and directory needs to be owned by (preferably) one rpm package. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories /usr/lib*/cifs-utils/ is originally owned by the cifs-utils package which has
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}
in the %files section of the spec file. I guess we should add
%dir {_libdir}/cifs-utils
to the sssd-client package and
%dir %{_libdir}/sssd/modules
to the sssd-common package.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 21. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '21'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 21 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. master: * 8d0051d4c8ac7de105a15e4bcc9df5567f8fad26 sssd-1.13.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-61146827f2 sssd-1.13.3-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dca09ef2d7 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-61146827f2 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dca09ef2d7 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-61146827f2 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dca09ef2d7 sssd-1.13.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. sssd-1.13.3-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |