Bug 1267682

Summary:	dnf partial upgrade with wildcards causes "dnf upgrade" to fail
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ronald L Humble <deadletterfile>
Component:	dnf	Assignee:	Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	23	CC:	jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-10-02 22:36:01 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ronald L Humble 2015-09-30 16:25:47 UTC

Description of problem:
dnf partial upgrade with wildcards causes "dnf upgrade" to fail

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dnf-1.1.2-2.fc23.noarch
How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.dnf upgrade v\* (available "v*" upgrades installed)
2.dnf upgrade 
   Last metadata expiration check performed 1:11:37 ago ...
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
3. dnf upgrade l\* (available upgrades beginning with "l" installed)

Actual results: :"dnf upgrade" reports "Nothing to do" in spite of upgrades being available.


Expected results:
"dnf upgrade v\*;dnf upgrade" should perform a complete upgrade of all available packages.
Additional info:
Fedora 22 upgrades act as have been accustomed to seeing. Exact letters used with wildcards not a factor. Note that the system tray icon reports multiple upgrades available prior to execution of these terminal commands. Choosing a "bad" letter is not a factor.

Comment 1 Michal Luscon 2015-10-02 22:36:01 UTC

Fixed in dnf-1.1.2-4.fc23.noarch.