Bug 1267938 (CVE-2015-7611)

Summary: CVE-2015-7611 apache-james-project: arbitrary command execution for servers configured with file based user repositories
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Martin Prpič <mprpic>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: java-sig-commits, mizdebsk, msrb
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: apache-james-project 2.3.2.1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-08 02:43:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1267939    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Martin Prpič 2015-10-01 12:21:27 UTC
A flaw was found in Apache James Server:

Apache James Server 2.3.2 has security issue that can let a user execute arbitrary system command for servers configured with file based user repositories.

2.3.2 users should upgrade to 2.3.2.1 to be downloaded from http://james.apache.org/download.cgi#Apache_James_Server

References:

http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/655

Comment 1 Martin Prpič 2015-10-01 12:22:02 UTC
Created apache-james-project tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1267939]

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-10-01 12:28:37 UTC
Is there CVE number available?

Comment 3 Martin Prpič 2015-10-01 12:33:30 UTC
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #2)
> Is there CVE number available?

Not that I'm aware of. I assume one will be assigned per the posting on oss-sec (http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/655).

Comment 4 Martin Prpič 2015-10-01 12:37:57 UTC
(In reply to Martin Prpic from comment #3)
> (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #2)
> > Is there CVE number available?
> 
> Not that I'm aware of. I assume one will be assigned per the posting on
> oss-sec (http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/655).

Ha, and right after I replied, I noticed MITRE assigned one :)

http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q4/0

Comment 5 Product Security DevOps Team 2019-06-08 02:43:47 UTC
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer to the dependent bugs for status of those individual community products.