Bug 1268986

Summary: gdal update for EPEL-6
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Andreas Luik <andreas.luik>
Component: gdalAssignee: Devrim Gündüz <devrim>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: el6CC: cristian.balint, devrim, jmlich83, pavel.lisy, pertusus, volker27
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-05 20:45:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andreas Luik 2015-10-05 20:05:11 UTC
Description of problem:

For RHEL 6, gdal 1.7.3-15.el6 is the latest version available in the EPEL-6 repository, whereas 1.11.1 is available in EPEL-7 and 1.11.3 is the latest upstream version. I would kindly ask for an update of GDAL in EPEL-6 to 1.11.x.

Comment 1 Devrim Gündüz 2015-10-05 20:45:16 UTC
This would break various packages around GDAL, which is against the EPEL policy.

Comment 2 Volker Fröhlich 2015-10-05 21:01:58 UTC
Sorry, but I'm afraid the EPEL policy does not allow for that:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy

If you need it for yourself, you can try to rebuild the package from Fedora. We used to have a downstream repo doing rebuilds (ELGIS) and I left the conditionals for EPEL inside. So it's probably still possible. What is more, Pavel Lisý has a COPR repo with backports:

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/pali/el6gis/builds/

Comment 3 Andreas Luik 2015-11-13 16:06:41 UTC
Thanks for the explanation.  Additional question: is anybody working to make gdal2 available in EPEL-6 (as an additional package using separate name and directories to not conflict with gdal-1.7)?

Comment 4 Volker Fröhlich 2015-11-14 12:14:03 UTC
Not that I knew. I wonder if it even makes sense, with most of the underlying libraries being old too.

Our manpower is very limited with GIS packaging and we greatly appreciate new volunteers.