Bug 1269873

Summary:	goa-daemon eats 4GB of RAM
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jaromír Cápík <jcapik>
Component:	gnome-online-accounts	Assignee:	Debarshi Ray <debarshir>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	22	CC:	debarshir, ovasik
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-07-19 18:09:16 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jaromír Cápík 2015-10-08 11:55:32 UTC

Description of problem:
Hello. My system recently started swapping because of some 'goa-daemon' process that ate 4GB of RAM while doing almost nothing. The funny thing is that I don't even know what the purpose of this daemon is. I'm almost sure this is a bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-online-accounts-3.16.3-1.fc22

How reproducible:
not sure

Actual results:
goa-daemon eating 4GB of RAM

Expected results:
goa-daemon eating < 100MB if possible

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 18:09:16 UTC

Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 3 Debarshi Ray 2017-03-31 13:53:15 UTC

There were a series of leak fixes in gnome-online-accounts, and with bug 1420678 I am confident that we nailed all the big culprits.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1420678 ***