Bug 1270960
Summary: | [DOCS] Port map for firewalls | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Alex Dellapenta <adellape> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | brice <bfallonf> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 3.0.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, bfallonf, ederevea, jokerman, mmccomas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-09-27 03:49:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alex Dellapenta
2015-10-12 18:34:58 UTC
A ports doc is now in the OSE 3.0 docs: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1136 *** Bug 1280411 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Can we make protocols more visible? I think it would be better to have TCP/80 UDP/4789 rather than notes at the end of the page. Also a question stands for port 53 - is it supposed to be both TCP and UDP? When I check my master I see that both TCP/53 and UDP/53 are being listened to. # lsof -i | grep domain openshift 952 root 40u IPv4 18625 0t0 TCP *:domain (LISTEN) openshift 952 root 41u IPv4 18627 0t0 UDP *:domain See comment in https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1136#issuecomment-161337791 for latest. The table is published in the 3.1 docs, but I'm moving this BZ back to ASSIGNED while I work on getting it into the 3.0 branch correctly (see above GH comment for details). I'll also address Evgheni's protocol suggestion (for both 3.0 and 3.1). Feedback from ccs list: "These tables in the 'required ports' section don't specify protocol, could you please add a column containing tcp/udp" @Brice - this is quite old and I am happy for you to close it if there is no more work to be done on this. From what I can see, this is currently in the docs, and goes back to 3.1. I'll close this. Alex, if you disagree and think it needs something else, let me know. |