Bug 1271519
Summary: | Error message "Unable to connect to the graphic server 127.0.0.1:xxxx" pops up | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Xiaodai Wang <xiaodwan> | ||||||||
Component: | virt-viewer | Assignee: | Virt Viewer Maint <virt-viewer-maint> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> | ||||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | cfergeau, dblechte, fidencio, jjongsma, juzhou, mxie, mzhan, pgrunt, rbalakri, tzheng, xiaodwan | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||||
Target Release: | 7.3 | ||||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | virt-viewer-2.0-7.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 01:11:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Created attachment 1082729 [details]
virt-viewer connect to guest successfully
Created attachment 1082730 [details]
virt-vewer connect to guest failure
The fact that you have these warnings even on the successful run makes me think that you are using a non-standard configuration of some sort: ** (virt-viewer:4874): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-3yGBLPcl8U: Connection refused (virt-viewer:5058): virt-viewer-DEBUG: Error: Failed to connect socket to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock-ro': No such file or directory I have not been able to reproduce the failure here, and I don't see any of those warnings above. Can you give a little more information on your setup? Is the client running on the same machine as the host? If not, what OS is the host? Yes, the client is running on the same machine as the host. It's easy to meet this problem at the first time. And then you redo the same operation, it's hard to reproduce it. I tried about 8~12 times to reproduce it again. So you can try it many times. Is this being run as root? Actually I can reproduce this on a 7.2 system. Building virt-viewer from 7.2 and running it on a fedora box leads to a different kind of failure for what it's worth (repeated "cannot connect to libvirt socket" messages during libvirtd downtime). (In reply to Christophe Fergeau from comment #6) > Is this being run as root? yes Some experiments I've run This triggers the bug: $ virsh destroy $domain_name $ virt-viewer $domain_name --wait $ systemctl stop libvirtd.service && systemctl start libvirtd.service $ $ virsh start $domain_name This does not trigger the bug: $ virsh destroy $domain_name $ virt-viewer $domain_name --wait $ systemctl stop libvirtd.service && systemctl start libvirtd.service $ $ virsh start $other_domain && virsh destroy $other_domain && sleep 1 && virsh start $domain_name This triggers the bug: $ virsh destroy $domain_name $ virt-viewer $domain_name --wait $ systemctl stop libvirtd.service && systemctl start libvirtd.service $ $ sleep 10 && virsh start $domain_name Adding a 1 second g_usleep in virt_viewer_session_spice_open_host() right before the spice_session_connect() call also makes the bug go away in all cases. Another thing to have in mind is that after a libvirt restart, virt-viewer does some polling to detect domain startup and connect to it rather than use libvirt domain events. See virt_viewer_start_reconnect_poll() and virt_viewer_connect_timer() and VirtViewer::domain_event. If I force domain_event to always be -1 in virt_viewer_connect(), I can sometimes reproduce this issue without a libvirtd restart. Why it's more reliably reproducible without a libvirtd restart, I don't know. My current theory is that by polling libvirt domain, we get connection information before the domain is fully ready (SPICE ports not initialized), and thus the connection fails. Maybe always using libvirt events instead of falling back to polling would fix this bug. https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2015-October/msg00043.html avoids this bug: it makes sure we don't keep polling when connecting to a recent (0.8 or newer) libvirtd. As only connections to VM through the polling code have this bug (I think), this patch will prevent the buggy situation from occurring. Here is the relevant commit for virt-viewer: c1e72c1be177544e5a718303dcb88412568f46d9 I can reproduce it with versions: virt-viewer-2.0-6.el7.x86_64 libvirt-1.2.17-13.el7.x86_64 And then only update virt-viewer to virt-viewer-2.0-7.el7.x86_64 and tried it several times again. It doesn't occur. At last updated libvirt to latest version libvirt-1.3.3-1.el7.x86_64 and tried it several times. I didn't meet this issue. So move the bug from ON_QA to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2229.html |
Created attachment 1082727 [details] error message box Description of problem: Error message "Unable to connect to the graphic server 127.0.0.1:xxxx" pops up. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): virt-viewer-2.0-6.el7.x86_64 libvirt-1.2.17-13.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: 80% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use virt-viewer connect to a shutdown guest. # G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all virt-viewer rhel7.2-0924 --wait 2. Stop libvirtd service on host. # service libvirtd stop 3. Start libvirtd service on host again. # service libvirtd start 4. Start the guest. Actual results: Error message "Unable to connect to the graphic server 127.0.0.1:xxxx" pops up. Expected results: virt-viewer should connect to the guest correctly. Additional info: I attached the debug logs for both success and failure.