Bug 1272530
Summary: | Review Request: python-mistralclient - python client for Mistral REST API | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniil <asteroid566> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Haïkel Guémar <karlthered> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | apevec, asteroid566, dprince, karlthered, lobo, package-review, tenobreg | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | karlthered:
fedora-review+
|
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2019-07-31 13:56:20 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Daniil
2015-10-16 16:07:32 UTC
Dan imported initial draft spec to openstack-packages/python-mistralclient, probably not aware of this review. I'll attach spec diff. Created attachment 1096567 [details]
Diff from mos-outside/rpm-master to openstack-packages/python-mistralclient
Looks like spec in openstack-packages/python-mistralclient was modified from some other client spec?
* Drop the first line * Drop Group tags, they are unused * Use versioned python macros %{__python2} and %{python2_sitelib} * Drop %clean section * Drop defattr * Name top level directories in %{python2_sitelib} %{python_sitelib}/ => means you own a directory owned by python package * Submit a package that can be compiled in Fedora (this is a Fedora review), the same goes for RDO reviews so that we could leverage Fedora semi-automated reviewing tools. Add version, release and changelog entry. * There is an error on the description Sytem -> System ping mflobo's scratch build of python-mistralclient-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12674107 Hi, Let's move this ticket :) Spec URL: http://mferminl.web.cern.ch/mferminl/fedorapkg/python-mistralclient/1.2.0/python-mistralclient.spec SRPM URL: http://mferminl.web.cern.ch/mferminl/fedorapkg/python-mistralclient/1.2.0/python-mistralclient-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Successful scratch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12674107 I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection, please submit SCM requestx Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1272530-python- mistralclient/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-mistralclient , python-mistralclient-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-mistralclient-1.2.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-mistralclient-doc-1.2.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-mistralclient-1.2.0-1.fc25.src.rpm python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistral python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient-2 python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient-2.7 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient-2.7 python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient-2 python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistralclient python2-mistralclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mistral 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Requires -------- python-mistralclient-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python2-mistralclient (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python2 PyYAML python(abi) python-cliff python-keystoneclient python-openstackclient python-pbr python-requests Provides -------- python-mistralclient-doc: python-mistralclient-doc python2-mistralclient: python-mistralclient python2-mistralclient Source checksums ---------------- http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/python-mistralclient/python-mistralclient-1.2.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ec815c0f0954c807e8be91573321c40f0c5706c7223c87c420bd30a7624e2045 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ec815c0f0954c807e8be91573321c40f0c5706c7223c87c420bd30a7624e2045 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1272530 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 |