Bug 1274950
Summary: | Missing description of resource units | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Erik M Jacobs <ejacobs> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Thien-Thi Nguyen <tnguyen> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0.0 | CC: | amelicha, aos-bugs, decarr, ejacobs, jokerman, mmccomas, tnguyen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-07 16:04:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Erik M Jacobs
2015-10-24 01:43:12 UTC
(In reply to Erik M Jacobs from comment #0) > We may want to incorporate something like: > > http://kubernetes.io/v1.0/docs/design/resources.html > > To explain what cores/cpu actually are. Specifically, the section on kcu/cpu: > > http://kubernetes.io/v1.0/docs/design/resources.html#processor-cycles The "Compute Resources" chapter of the Developer Guide: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/openshift-enterprise/version-3.1/developer-guide/#compute-resource-units seems to partially satisfy this BZ. (It's still missing some mention of "kcu".) Do we still want to include "kcu" info? What about the current text -- is it sufficient? The question regarding KCU would need to be answered by engineering. Part of the reason KCU exists is because of CPU scaling, but I'm not sure we're exposing that to customers. I would say that most of the text is sufficient but someone should probably decide whether or not we need to talk about KCU. Thanks for the redirect. Setting needinfo to the the author (AFAICT) of the Compute Resources chapter, who is in engineering. (Derek, please see comments 3 and 4.) I think the current text is sufficient. Until such time that we look to support normalization of compute across the cluster with any more intelligence, just describing compute in terms of fractional cores is the clearest thing that we can do. I think anything else introduces confusion. Moving to CLOSED NOTABUG. |