Bug 1275610

Summary: RFE: JavaFX
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Levente Farkas <lfarkas>
Component: java-1.8.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: zzambers
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.1CC: cww, dbhole, dkochuka, joerg.kastning, jvanek, jwright, loskutov, mmillson, neugens, raines, saime, sudesh
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-11 21:45:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1594286, 1597239    

Description Levente Farkas 2015-10-27 10:26:55 UTC
the same apply to rhel 6 and 7 as described in #1145303. is there any plan to include JavaFX in java-1.8.0-openjdk?

Comment 2 jiri vanek 2015-10-27 11:00:06 UTC
Deffinitely not inside openjdk. And probablky not in baseOS. And definitely not for 7.2. Sorry.

JavaFX is in fedora and is quite painful to maintain for now.

Once it is settled  its default inclusion in openjdk will be a must.

Comment 3 Deepak Bhole 2018-01-29 16:47:43 UTC
*** Bug 1539796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 jiri vanek 2018-02-07 12:35:28 UTC
I have implemented javafx-desc support for ITW. It works moreover fine with JavaFX as we have it in fedora. I have posted long info into Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145303#c140

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2018-11-28 21:41:21 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 8 Deepak Bhole 2018-11-28 21:43:47 UTC
Nack'd for 7.7, but didn't mean to close this completely.

Comment 9 Deepu K S 2019-03-28 10:14:17 UTC
Any chance that JavaFX will be shipped with openjdk 11 ?

Comment 10 Deepak Bhole 2019-03-29 16:34:18 UTC
(In reply to Deepu K S from comment #9)
> Any chance that JavaFX will be shipped with openjdk 11 ?

Hi Deepu, we have no plans to support JavaFX at this time (11 or otherwise).

Comment 13 Andrey Loskutov 2019-05-29 11:02:21 UTC
Just to confirm: this decision is also related to the providing rpm's for any future JavaFX versions (independently on any OpenJDK "X" packages, since JavaFX was separated from JDK)?

Means, as RHEL customers, we will never be able to consume JavaFX libraries provided by Red Hat?

I see that there are rpms from https://openjfx.io/ (via https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/), and looking for similar rpm's from Red Hat.

Comment 19 jiri vanek 2019-07-18 09:07:24 UTC
Wasn't javafx recently deprecated?

Comment 22 Joerg K 2020-01-16 20:07:32 UTC
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #19)
> Wasn't javafx recently deprecated?

I guess not. It is supported by the company Gluon as a downloadable module in addition to the JDK. See: https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/

Comment 25 Chris Williams 2020-11-11 21:45:28 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 shipped it's final minor release on September 29th, 2020. 7.9 was the last minor releases scheduled for RHEL 7.
From intial triage it does not appear the remaining Bugzillas meet the inclusion criteria for Maintenance Phase 2 and will now be closed. 

From the RHEL life cycle page:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata#Maintenance_Support_2_Phase
"During Maintenance Support 2 Phase for Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 7,Red Hat defined Critical and Important impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected (at Red Hat discretion) Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available."

If this BZ was closed in error and meets the above criteria please re-open it flag for 7.9.z, provide suitable business and technical justifications, and follow the process for Accelerated Fixes:
https://source.redhat.com/groups/public/pnt-cxno/pnt_customer_experience_and_operations_wiki/support_delivery_accelerated_fix_release_handbook  

Feature Requests can re-opened and moved to RHEL 8 if the desired functionality is not already present in the product. 

Please reach out to the applicable Product Experience Engineer[0] if you have any questions or concerns.  

[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=agile_component_mapping.html&product=Red+Hat+Enterprise+Linux+7