Bug 1276835

Summary: Not able to install german languagepack
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matthias31 <fiedler_matthias>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, ltinkl, mstahl, sbergman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-02 07:40:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matthias31 2015-10-31 08:51:55 UTC
Description of problem:
you are not able to install germanen language pack by the cuttent Libreoffice version

"dnf install libreoffice-langpack-de
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Fri Oct 30 21:15:50 2015.
Fehler: package libreoffice-langpack-de-1:5.0.0.5-2.fc23.x86_64 requires libreoffice-core = 1:5.0.0.5-2.fc23, but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)"

Why it will download and install an older release then 5.0.3.2??

for more details look here: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/285369/14462335/

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

everytime
How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.install fedora 23
2.get terminal as Root
3.type dnf install libreoffice-langpack-de

Actual results:
it won't install the languangepack 

Expected results:
german languagepack shuld be installed sucessfully

Additional info:

Comment 1 Matthias31 2015-10-31 14:42:35 UTC
Workaround:
you can Download the Libreoffice 5.0.2 and the german langpackfrom libreoffice.org and install with rpm -ivh so that will work

Comment 2 Stephan Bergmann 2015-11-02 07:40:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1276279 ***