Bug 127887

Summary: installer is unfriendly to non-DDC monitor
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: John Reiser <jreiser>
Component: firstbootAssignee: Paul Nasrat <nobody+pnasrat>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: barryn, bernd.bartmann, hp, katzj
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-24 09:13:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John Reiser 2004-07-14 21:47:37 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625

Description of problem:
A Sony Multiscan 15sf CRT monitor will do 1024x768 @75Hz, but it has
no DDC.  During install and firstboot, the monitor is detected as
"Unprobed monitor" and there is no opportunity to override this, nor
is there a message about how to change it after installation.  The
screen comes up as 800x600 instead.

Not allowing override of "Unprobed monitor" during install and/or
firstboot is an unexpected decrease in functionality.  Both the
Anaconda developers and I have worked hard over the past 2 or 3 years
to get the manual choice working correctly (H&V frequencies were
swapped once; Dell Laptop screen choice was not clear; etc.).  The FC1
and FC2 installers finally had good support for non-DDC monitors.  Why
was this support removed?



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firstboot-1.3.16-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Fresh graphical install from CD-ROM using CRT monitor without DDC.
2. Enter X11 configuration screen of firstboot.
3.
    

Actual Results:  During firstboot the only choice is color depth
(hundreds, thousands, or millions of colors); there is no choice to
override "Unprobed monitor".

Expected Results:  There should be a choice to override "Unprobed
monitor" by choosing from the monitor database.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Barry K. Nathan 2004-07-15 03:53:41 UTC
If you boot the installer with the "resolution=1024x768" option and
(re)install with that, does that make any difference to the final
installed system?

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2004-07-15 05:06:09 UTC
The plan is to add a "select monitor" button to the firstboot screen,
just haven't gotten there yet.

Comment 3 John Reiser 2004-07-15 05:54:38 UTC
Replying to Comment #1 (Barry K Nathan): booting the installer with
"linux resolution=1024x768" gets a Monitor section in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf with HorizSync of 31.5 - 48.5, and a Screen section
than has 1024x768 first.  Thus the screen is 1024x768 @60Hz, according
to "xrandr".  In order to get @75Hz, then I copy from RHEL3 which has
HorizSync 31.0 - 64.0 (and VertRefresh of 50.0 to 120.0 instead of
40.0 - 70.0).


Comment 4 Paul Nasrat 2004-07-15 06:30:09 UTC
In addition to the feature work one useful thing the original poster 
can do to get the monitor added to the database is (quoting mharris):

" All you have to do, is attach Microsoft Windows .INF 
files supplied by the monitor manufacturer into a bugzilla bug 
report that requests the entries be added to the database.  Feel 
free to attach all .INF files for all monitors of a given brand, 
or of as many brands as you like, and they'll all get processed 
simultaneously."

If you could open a seperate bug against hwdata with the monitor.inf
attached that would be useful.


Comment 5 Barry K. Nathan 2004-07-15 08:22:40 UTC
Sony Multiscan 15sf is already in the database -- it just doesn't have
DDC support and thus can't be automatically probed.

Comment 6 Paul Nasrat 2004-08-19 09:37:42 UTC
I've added a button to the firstboot screen in system-config-display
for monitor detection. Will appear in rawhide shortly.

Comment 7 Paul Nasrat 2004-08-19 10:24:34 UTC
*** Bug 121827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Paul Nasrat 2004-08-24 08:54:34 UTC
*** Bug 130679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Paul Nasrat 2004-08-24 08:58:56 UTC
*** Bug 114796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***