Bug 127891

Summary: Digital signature details dialog does not allow text selection
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jon Orris <jorris>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mcepl
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-02 16:39:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot with unverified key
none
Verified key none

Description Jon Orris 2004-07-14 22:27:06 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040706 Firefox/0.9.1

Description of problem:
The Digital Signature Details dialog that pops up when one clicks a
signature in an e-mail does not allow the text to be selected. I've
heard that text select works if the signature is verified, but it
doesn't for me.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.5.9.1-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Receive a GPG signed e-mail
2. Click the signature icon
3. Attempt to select the text in the dialog box. You can't.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jon Orris 2004-07-14 22:39:42 UTC
Created attachment 101921 [details]
Screenshot with unverified key

Comment 2 Jon Orris 2004-07-14 22:42:13 UTC
Created attachment 101922 [details]
Verified key

Comment 3 Dave Malcolm 2005-08-24 02:51:24 UTC
Appears to still affect rawhide (evolution 2.3.7)

Comment 5 Matthew Barnes 2006-12-31 22:18:37 UTC
Are you still encountering this problem in Fedora Core 6?

If so, could you please attach a sample GPG signed email or two, maybe one with
a verified key and the other with an unverfied key?  That would help me
reproduce the problem more easily.

Comment 6 Matěj Cepl 2007-08-31 16:11:16 UTC
Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in
one month, this bug will be closed as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you.


Comment 7 Matthew Barnes 2007-10-02 16:39:03 UTC
Closing as INSUFFICIENT_DATA.