Bug 1280058
Summary: | iconv appears to be adding a duplicate "SI" to the output for certain inputs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jacob Hunt <jhunt> | |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Carlos O'Donell <codonell> | |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 5.11 | CC: | alanm, ashankar, bgollahe, codonell, fweimer, jhunt, mnewsome, msebor, ngalvin, pfrankli, rzaleski | |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch | |
Target Release: | 5.11 | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: |
A defect in the character conversion routines for the IBM930, IBM933, IBM935, IBM937, and IBM939 character sets could result in a redundant shift sequence being output under certain library internal conditions. The redundant shift sequence makes the output non-conforming and can result in an inability to read back the output data. The character conversion routines have been corrected and no longer output a redundant shift sequence.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1293914 1293916 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-01-25 18:56:05 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: |
Description
Jacob Hunt
2015-11-10 20:56:51 UTC
The upstream bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17204) is still open and none of the patches has been committed. (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > The upstream bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17204) is > still open and none of the patches has been committed. That should be upstream bug 17197. Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in a future release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. To request that Red Hat re-consider this request, please re-open the bugzilla via appropriate support channels and provide additional business and/or technical details about its importance to you. (In reply to Matt Newsome from comment #34) > We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it > in a future release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. To be fully accurate, we are unable to include it in a future release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, though we do hope to fix this in later major releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. |