Bug 1283586

Summary:	[RFE] Ability to install a HA Satellite 6 infrastructure
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Duncan Innes <duncan>
Component:	Installation	Assignee:	Katello Bug Bin <katello-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1.4	CC:	bkearney, rjain, xdmoon
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-12-17 16:40:41 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	260381, 1425213

Description Duncan Innes 2015-11-19 11:05:08 UTC

Description of problem: Satellite 6 is not HA across all components


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1


How reproducible: Every install


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try and build HA setup with Satellite 6
2. 
3.

Actual results:
You won't quite manage it

Expected results:
Satellite 6 HA infrastructure
i.e. multiple multiple Foreman/Katello/Candlepin/Puppet/Pulp/etc servers all behind load balancer(s) with separate replicated database servers at back-end (not just PostgreSQL).


Additional info:
As well as being HA, this provides the ability for Satellite 6 to scale performance as well.

Comment 1 Duncan Innes 2015-11-19 11:07:30 UTC

This ticket is based on having seen the HA possibilities for Foreman in: "Foreman Case Study: High Availability" https://youtu.be/bJ5a67SSA-s

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2015-12-17 16:40:41 UTC

The HA document has been published at

https://access.redhat.com/articles/2089291

Closing this out. I do not expect the installer to have a --ha type option