Bug 1284230

Summary: openstack-packstack failed to execute due to "ImportError: No module named OpenSSL"
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nitdgp>
Component: openstack-packstackAssignee: Alan Pevec (Fedora) <apevec>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: apevec, gchamoul, gdubreui, ichavero, itamar, jpena, karlthered, mfuruta, mmagr, social
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-20 16:10:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Praveen Kumar 2015-11-22 06:30:16 UTC
Description of problem:
After installation of openstack-packstack, it failed to execute due to OpenSSL module error.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openstack-packstack-2015.1-0.9.dev1608.g6447ff7.fc23.noarch

How reproducible:
Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install openstack-packstack
2. Execute packstack --allinone
3. Import error and traceback


Actual results:

ERROR:root:Failed to load plugin from file prescript_000.py
ERROR:root:Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/installer/run_setup.py", line 885, in loadPlugins
    moduleobj = __import__(moduleToLoad)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/plugins/prescript_000.py", line 36, in <module>
    from packstack.modules.ospluginutils import appendManifestFile
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/modules/ospluginutils.py", line 17, in <module>
    from OpenSSL import crypto
ImportError: No module named OpenSSL

ERROR:root:Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/installer/run_setup.py", line 950, in main
    loadPlugins()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/installer/run_setup.py", line 893, in loadPlugins
    raise Exception("Failed to load plugin from file %s" % item)
Exception: Failed to load plugin from file prescript_000.py


Expected results:

It should execute without any traceback.

Additional info:

Looks like pyOpenSSL is missing from Requires section of openstack-packstack specfile which need to be included.

Comment 1 Javier Peña 2015-11-23 09:32:45 UTC
pyOpenSSL is listed as a dependency for the openstack-packstack package: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-packstack.git/tree/openstack-packstack.spec#n34 .  Can you check if the pyOpenSSL package was properly pulled in as a dependency?

Comment 2 Praveen Kumar 2015-11-23 09:58:44 UTC
(In reply to Javier Peña from comment #1)
> pyOpenSSL is listed as a dependency for the openstack-packstack package:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-packstack.git/tree/openstack-
> packstack.spec#n34 .  Can you check if the pyOpenSSL package was properly
> pulled in as a dependency?

http://fpaste.org/293442/82725571/ 

This will show what is pulled by openstack-packstack (not include pyOpenSSL because #68 shows dnf is able to install it). Check also info for openstack-packstack hope we it;s updated one.

Comment 3 Javier Peña 2015-11-23 10:13:10 UTC
Ok, now it makes sense to me. I read "rawhide" in the bug entry and didn't realize the package was f23.

This was corrected in build openstack-packstack-2015.1-0.10.dev1608.g6447ff7.fc23 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674312), however neither this one or a later version have made their way into the updates repo. We'll try to fix that asap.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-17 15:06:43 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 13:38:16 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2016-12-20 16:10:15 UTC
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.