Bug 1286003

Summary: non declared dependency on python-oslo-serialization
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Matthias Runge <mrunge>
Component: python-ceilometerclientAssignee: Mehdi ABAAKOUK <mabaakou>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Shai Revivo <srevivo>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.0 (Juno)CC: jruzicka, mabaakou, mburns, rhel-osp-director-maint, sreber, srevivo
Target Milestone: asyncKeywords: AutoVerified, ZStream
Target Release: 6.0 (Juno)   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-ceilometerclient-1.0.14-4.el7ost.noarch Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-20 12:36:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matthias Runge 2015-11-27 08:26:00 UTC 
Description of problem:
in a recent OSP-6 install:

rpm -q python-ceilometerclient
python-ceilometerclient-1.0.14-2.el7ost.noarch

rpm -q --requires python-ceilometerclient
/usr/bin/python
python(abi) = 2.7
python-argparse
python-iso8601
python-keystoneclient
python-oslo-utils
python-prettytable
python-setuptools
python-six >= 1.7.0
python-stevedore
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1


but:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ceilometerclient/common/utils.py has:

#    under the License.

from __future__ import print_function

import sys
import textwrap
import uuid

from oslo.serialization import jsonutils
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

from oslo.utils import encodeutils
from oslo.utils import importutils
import prettytable
Comment 2 Matthias Runge 2016-02-24 08:42:08 UTC 
*** Bug 1311422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-07-20 12:36:29 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1459