Bug 1286440
Summary: | minidnf cannot cope with dnf empty history as dnf does not provide root history transaction | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Yaniv Lavi <ylavi> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | alonbl, amureini, bugs, jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, penguin.wrangler, pnemade, vmukhame, ylavi |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | integration | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1279051 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2015-12-01 12:57:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1279051 |
Description
Yaniv Lavi
2015-11-29 14:06:31 UTC
minidnf is not part of fedora nor dnf, why was this bug dup? when opening a bug on dependency you should describe exactly what you expect the history is irrelevant, the terms should be within dependencies term. it may not worth the effort to handle this anyway, as this is edge condition using non public api. |