Bug 1287273

Summary: please update to polib 1.0.7
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David Shea <dshea>
Component: python-polibAssignee: Ding-Yi Chen <dchen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: dchen, diegobz, i18n-bugs, ivazqueznet, pnemade
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc22 python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23 python-polib-1.0.7-2.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-02 00:53:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Shea 2015-12-01 21:09:44 UTC
The latest upstream version of python-polib contains several fixes related to Python 3 and parsing of plural entries and it would be nice to have in Fedora. Thanks.

Comment 1 David Shea 2016-01-08 14:45:31 UTC
Any update on this?

Comment 2 Parag Nemade 2016-01-08 15:48:02 UTC
I see that this package owner is having very less activity in Fedora over the last 2 years and have not done a single commit to dist-git.

Let me build this in rawhide only. Looks like spec need to cleaned for recent changes happened in packaging guidelines.

Comment 3 David Shea 2016-01-08 15:58:28 UTC
(In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #2)
> I see that this package owner is having very less activity in Fedora over
> the last 2 years and have not done a single commit to dist-git.
> 
> Let me build this in rawhide only. Looks like spec need to cleaned for
> recent changes happened in packaging guidelines.

Thank you, I appreciate it. If you could, though, leave this bug open when you're done for nonresponsive maintainer purposes, since there seems to be pretty good grounds for that between this and a couple other packages (xmlcopyeditor in bug 1240085, purple-plugin_pack in bug 890738). I've also reached out to Ignacio via email and have not yet received a response.

Comment 4 Parag Nemade 2016-01-08 16:09:14 UTC
Build python-polib-1.0.7-1.fc24 is completed. Please test and if needed any more fix, do ask here. Leaving this bug open.

Here is a link of datagrepper for this user's work in Fedora -> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?user=ivazquez

Comment 5 David Shea 2016-01-15 22:08:33 UTC
Ignacio, is there any update on this? Are you still interested in maintaining the package?

Comment 6 Ding-Yi Chen 2016-01-19 06:36:58 UTC
As this package also required in EPEL6 which does have python3-devel, perhaps we should use the conditional build.

I have commit right on almost all the branches except EPEL7. Perhaps I can help to build.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-01-21 08:43:15 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4f3305b01c

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-01-21 08:43:17 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-022d31c2dd

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2016-01-21 08:43:19 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-022d31c2dd

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-01-21 08:43:23 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e0671def92

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-01-22 04:56:45 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4f3305b01c

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-01-22 07:50:10 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-022d31c2dd

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-01-23 21:29:46 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e0671def92

Comment 14 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-01-27 17:40:15 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 15 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-01-27 21:56:27 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 16 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-01-27 21:59:57 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2016-02-02 00:53:32 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2016-02-02 05:49:44 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2016-02-10 11:03:29 UTC
python-polib-1.0.7-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 20 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:14:09 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days