Bug 1288166
| Summary: | [RHEL] package version dependencies are looser than needed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Component: | Build | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 1.3.1 | CC: | flucifre, hnallurv, hyelloji, kdreyer |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | hyelloji:
needinfo+
|
| Target Release: | 1.3.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-0.94.5-1.el7cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-02-29 14:44:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2015-12-03 17:39:19 UTC
(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #0) > Currently it is possible that if a customer uses yum to update ... I meant to say: it is possible that if a customer uses yum to update packages individually, or subscribes to "rhel-7-server-rhceph-1.3-tools-rpms" without also subscribing to "rhel-7-server-rhceph-1.3-osd-rpms", etc. then they could hit this bug. Hi Ken, I verified this fix by installing OSD packages from 1.3.1 ISO and then upgrading ceph-common from 1.3.2 puddle and all the dependent packages also got upgraded. I have captured the execution steps in pastebin(http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/345504), can you check if the procedure I followed is same as the problem you have raised. Let me know if my understanding is right as I was bit confused with the Bug Description Looks fine to me Moving to Verified State Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:0313 |