Bug 1288277

Summary:	claws-mail-plugins-vcalendar needs to be rebuilt for EL7.2
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Anssi Johansson <rhbugs>
Component:	claws-mail	Assignee:	Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel7	CC:	andreas.bierfert, bill-bugzilla.redhat.com, kupo, ssorce, tony.albers
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Anssi Johansson 2015-12-04 01:07:32 UTC

Description of problem:
claws-mail-plugins-vcalendar depends on libicalvcal.so.0, libicalss.so.0 and libical.so.0, provided by libical-0.48-6.el7 in RHEL 7.1.

libical was updated in RHEL 7.2, and the updated libical packages provides libicalvcal.so.1, libicalss.so.1 and libical.so.1. This means claws-mail-plugins-vcalendar will need to be rebuilt against the new library to be usable on RHEL 7.2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.11.1-5.el7

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade to RHEL 7.2
2. yum install claws-mail-plugins-vcalendar

Actual results:
See yum complain about a missing dependency

Expected results:
claws-mail-plugins-vcalendar gets installed

Additional info:
EPEL7's builders have already been updated to RHEL 7.2, so it probably suffices to just bump the release number and rebuild.

Comment 1 Bill McGonigle 2016-01-20 14:18:56 UTC

Rebuilding does work as expected.

I'm not quite sure why but when I installed build dependencies on my 7.2 builder machine via yum-builddep and then built claws-mail, I still got the so.0 vs. so.1 problem upon install on my client machine (fully updated to current -updates).

I downloaded this SRPM:
  http://vault.centos.org/7.2.1511/os/Source/SPackages/libical-1.0.1-1.el7.src.rpm

and built/installed that locally on my builder machine and then built claws-mail again, and then when I installed those RPM's on my client machine (just new claws-mail - libical still stock), it was fine.

The version yum pulled in on the builder was:
  Jan 20 08:31:35 Installed: libical-1.0.1-1.el7.x86_64
  Jan 20 08:32:28 Installed: libical-devel-1.0.1-1.el7.x86_64

and then my rebuild from source produced the same version:

  libical-devel-1.0.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64

so I'm not sure what's going on there.  I'm hesitant to assume there's anything wrong with the stock libical builds, but usually this process is deterministic.

Comment 2 Tony Albers 2016-10-05 07:44:03 UTC

Is the rebuilt package available anywhere?

I'm running into this exact issue on a RHEL 7.2

Thx

Comment 3 Anssi Johansson 2018-08-22 14:57:17 UTC

Ping?