Bug 128829
Summary: | Bad: The "gnumeric" package is missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | Need Real Name <riches> |
Component: | gnumeric | Assignee: | dff <dff> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | CC: | caolanm, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-10-29 21:38:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Need Real Name
2004-07-30 03:29:27 UTC
over to caolan Not a technical flaw, gnumeric was not shipped with RHEL3. I would like to second this comment. Our users too rely on gnumeric and now that we've switched to RHEL, they still need gnumeric (particularly for backword compatibility). I suppose this is really a request for enhancement, not a "bug". We currently support OpenOffice.org as our spreadsheet solution, and aren't planning to add support for gnumeric to RHEL 3 or future RHEL releases at this time. How come gnumeric is listed as being in RHEL 4 (according to the release notes)? It doesn't seem to appear in the actual distribution. |