Bug 1288649

Summary:	Review Request: cmark - cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Mairi Dulaney <jdulaney>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nick Bebout <nb>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	gbailey, nb, package-review, petersen, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	nb: fedora-review?
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-01-20 13:10:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mairi Dulaney 2015-12-04 21:21:51 UTC

Spec URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark-0.22.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 
cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark,
a rationalized version of Markdown syntax with a spec.
(For the JavaScript reference implementation, see commonmark.js.)

It provides a shared library (libcmark) with functions for
parsing CommonMark documents to an abstract syntax tree
(AST), manipulating the AST, and rendering the document to
HTML, groff man, LaTeX, CommonMark, or an XML representation
of the AST. It also provides a command-line program (cmark) for
parsing and rendering CommonMark documents.
Fedora Account System Username:  jdulaney

Comment 1 Mairi Dulaney 2016-01-15 18:35:46 UTC

Beuler?

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2016-01-20 08:06:47 UTC

I just note that there was a review request open already (bug 1266429)
but that is probably okay (and it was waiting on me...).
My interest in this is for pandoc which now requires cmark.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2016-01-20 09:31:50 UTC

I just updated my packaging to 0.23.0 in bug 1266429.

Anyway I am happy to collaborate.  If you want
to review my package which already received some comments
then I am also happy to comaintain the package together.

Comment 4 Mairi Dulaney 2016-01-20 13:10:52 UTC

Ooops, I missed that.  Sure, I'll go ahead and review your package and we can comaintain.  Closing this one.

Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-03-09 18:44:31 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1266429 ***