Bug 1288846

Summary: Allow to set needinfo on assignee\reporter\qa contact\docs contact
Product: [Community] Bugzilla Reporter: Yaniv Lavi <ylavi>
Component: ExtensionsAssignee: Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn>
Extensions sub component: RuleEngine QA Contact: Rony Gong 🔥 <qgong>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: low CC: blc
Version: 4.4   
Target Milestone: 5.0-RH4   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.4-rh18 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-03 00:25:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Yaniv Lavi 2015-12-06 13:52:28 UTC
Description of problem:
Currently there is no way to place a needinfo on a bug assignee\reporter\qa contact\docs contact without explicit email mentioned. Please allow to do this.

Comment 1 Yaniv Lavi 2015-12-14 08:09:37 UTC
The severity for our flows is high, why did you change this?

Comment 3 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2017-10-10 07:46:30 UTC
Note that needinfo for assignee and qa roles are settable from the need info box below the new comment box. You can use it even if you aren't making a comment.

Comment 4 Yaniv Lavi 2017-12-24 13:32:41 UTC
(In reply to Jeff Fearn from comment #3)
> Note that needinfo for assignee and qa roles are settable from the need info
> box below the new comment box. You can use it even if you aren't making a
> comment.

This request is for the rules engine.

Comment 5 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2019-02-21 22:52:14 UTC
*** Bug 1679762 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2019-03-11 03:41:24 UTC
*** Bug 1687246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Rony Gong 🔥 2019-03-22 08:28:54 UTC
Verified on QA server, PASS
Now, in the rule action page, for the needinfo action. we can set it with %reporter%, %assignee%.....
It can work well.

Comment 9 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2019-04-16 00:32:17 UTC
This change has been deployed to partner bugzilla, please test and let us know if you have any issues.

https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/

Comment 10 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2019-05-03 00:25:29 UTC
This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this
bug. Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug.