Bug 1289893
| Summary: | Excessive "dict is NULL" logging | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Anuradha <atalur> |
| Component: | replicate | Assignee: | Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Neha <nerawat> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | asrivast, byarlaga, nchilaka, ravishankar, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, sashinde, smohan, storage-qa-internal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | RHGS 3.1.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.7.5-12 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-01 06:02:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Anuradha
2015-12-09 09:43:26 UTC
Steps to reproduce: 1] Created 4+2 EC vol 2] Fuse mount on client 3] Initiated some IO Brick logs flooded with message: [2015-12-25 02:57:44.071028] W [dict.c:1282:dict_foreach_match] (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.5/xlator/features/index.so(index_fill_zero_array+0xc) [0x7fea119faaec] -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.5/xlator/features/index.so(+0x3a8a) [0x7fea119faa8a] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(dict_foreach_match+0xe3) [0x7fea25b22c73] ) 0-dict: dict|match|action is NULL [Invalid argument] glusterfs-3.7.5-10.el7rhgs.x86_64 Not able to reproduce this with latest build "glusterfs-3.7.5-13.el7rhgs.x86_64", moving it to verified. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0193.html |