Bug 1290844
Summary: | [Debian] provide libvirt >= 1.2.17 for vdsm >= 4.17.13 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-distribution | Reporter: | Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo> |
Component: | General | Assignee: | Milan Zamazal <mzamazal> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.1.0 | CC: | bugs, didi, lveyde, mzamazal, sbonazzo, stirabos, ylavi |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sbonazzo:
ovirt-4.3-
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-03-27 07:28:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | External | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sandro Bonazzola
2015-12-11 15:43:43 UTC
Moving to Milan since he's porting vdsm to Debian The best way to handle this would be to coordinate with Debian Libvirt Maintainers to make an official jessie backport of libvirt. Let's see whether the overall jessie backport is worth the effort (i.e. whether there's a real demand for that from users) after I finish the Vdsm packaging for unstable. Moving to 4.0, though I suggest closing if not handled. oVirt 4.0 beta has been released, moving to RC milestone. Do we want to keep monitoring our Debian support here, or switch to some other (Debian related) bug database? Are we ever going to handle this, or should I CLOSE-DEFERRED this? I don't think it makes sense tracking Debian packaging here. We have removed Debian packaging from Vdsm since it was completely broken. It's better to track the Debian packaging effort directly in Debian and/or on ovirt-devel mailing list. The intent-to-package bug for Vdsm in Debian is https://bugs.debian.org/668538, this is what we start with. If we manage to make a working Vdsm Debian package, its bugs should be reported to Debian BTS. So I'd suggest closing the Debian packaging bugs in Vdsm Bugzilla. I don't think anybody cares about using Debian hosts anymore and I've abandoned my Debian work for that reason long time ago. So I suggest closing this bug as WONTFIX. |