Bug 1291200
| Summary: | perl-GD-2.56-5.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'image comparison test 7' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
| Component: | perl-GD | Assignee: | Paul Howarth <paul> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | paul, perl-devel, tcallawa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12051912 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | perl-GD-2.56-6.fc24 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-12-14 15:12:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Please note this blocks perl-Business-ISBN that blocks perl-URI that blocks perl-HTML-Parser that blocks another 1300 packages. Maybe we should move URI::urn::isbn from perl-URI into a new sub-package (for example perl-URI-urn-isbn). That new subpackage would still require perl-Business-ISBN, but it wouldn't be required by perl-URI. (We already have the Business::ISBN BuildRequire conditionalized by %perl_bootstrap, but for some reason, the run Require is not. That does not make sense for me.) The test failure is caused by upgrading freetype from 2.6.1-1.fc24 to 2.6.2-1.fc24. (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1) > (We already > have the Business::ISBN BuildRequire conditionalized by %perl_bootstrap, but > for some reason, the run Require is not. That does not make sense for me.) Omitting a BuildRequire during bootstrapping generally results in fewer tests being run but the resulting binary package is exactly the same as it would have been with the BuildRequire present. On the other hand, omitting a run Require results in a different binary package, and hence different buildroots for every package that is built using the bootstrapped package. So you'd want to rebuild all of those packages too post-bootstrap to make sure all their tests ran successfully, which would potentially extend the bootstrap process quite significantly. I think it might be worthwhile to disable the image comparison test: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100294 (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1) > > (We already > > have the Business::ISBN BuildRequire conditionalized by %perl_bootstrap, but > > for some reason, the run Require is not. That does not make sense for me.) > > Omitting a BuildRequire during bootstrapping generally results in fewer > tests being run but the resulting binary package is exactly the same as it > would have been with the BuildRequire present. > > On the other hand, omitting a run Require results in a different binary > package, and hence different buildroots for every package that is built > using the bootstrapped package. So you'd want to rebuild all of those > packages too post-bootstrap to make sure all their tests ran successfully, > which would potentially extend the bootstrap process quite significantly. > I know (*). But what's the purpose of omitting some tests? Especially on perl_bootstrap? With current perl-URI.spec you will get binary package that cannot be installed either, so it should not have any effect on build graph when bootstrapping. (* Pure theoretically, having installed additional packages at build time should be idempotent. That's what I expect from good build script.) > I think it might be worthwhile to disable the image comparison test: > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100294 Ah. yet another instance of the failure. That would be probably the simplest fix. I made that failing text test a TODO test. Thanks. |
perl-GD-2.56-5.fc24 fails to build in F24 because a test fails: + ./Build test # Testing using gd2 support. # Failed test 'image comparison test 7' # at t/GD.t line 249. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 11. t/GD.t ........ Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/11 subtests t/Polyline.t .. ok Test Summary Report ------------------- t/GD.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 11 Failed: 1) Failed test: 9 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=2, Tests=12, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.16 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.20 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/2 test programs. 1/12 subtests failed. Difference between working and failing build root is: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker 7.10-1.fc24 > 7.10-2.fc24 freetype-devel 2.6.1-1.fc24 > 2.6.2-1.fc24 perl-podlators 4.00-1.fc24 > 4.02-1.fc24 perl-Unicode-Normalize 1.23-1.fc24 > 1.24-1.fc24 perl-ExtUtils-Command 7.10-1.fc24 > 7.10-2.fc24 freetype 2.6.1-1.fc24 > 2.6.2-1.fc24 dbus-libs 1:1.10.4-1.fc24 > 1:1.11.0-1.fc24 device-mapper 1.02.111-1.fc24 > 1.02.112-1.fc24 libcurl 7.45.0-1.fc24 > 7.46.0-1.fc24 nettle 3.1.1-4.fc24 > 3.1.1-5.fc24 pcre 8.38-3.fc24 > 8.38-4.fc24 curl 7.45.0-1.fc24 > 7.46.0-1.fc24 perl-Time-HiRes > 1.9728-1.fc24 libxml2 2.9.3-1.fc24 > 2.9.3-2.fc24 libassuan 2.4.1-1.fc24 > 2.4.2-1.fc24 zsh > 5.2-1.fc24 perl-Encode-Locale > 1.05-3.fc23 krb5-libs 1.14-10.fc24 > 1.14-11.fc24 dbus 1:1.10.4-1.fc24 > 1:1.11.0-1.fc24 kernel-headers 4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1.... > 4.4.0-0.rc3.git3.1.... device-mapper-libs 1.02.111-1.fc24 > 1.02.112-1.fc24 unzip 6.0-26.fc24 > 6.0-27.fc24