Bug 1291383

Summary: gpaw FTBFS on aarch64
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi>
Component: gpawAssignee: marcindulak <Marcin.Dulak>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: Marcin.Dulak, yselkowi
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: aarch64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gpaw-0.11.0.13004-21.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-09 14:28:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 922257, 1285484    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Fix build on aarch64 (#1291383) none

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-14 18:15:31 UTC
gpaw config.py does not handle aarch64, causing the build to fail there.  The following patch from rawhide fixes the build; please merge this into epel7 and f23 as well.

Comment 1 Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-14 18:16:31 UTC
Created attachment 1105628 [details]
Fix build on aarch64 (#1291383)

Comment 2 marcindulak 2015-12-17 12:52:30 UTC
Commited in http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gpaw.git/commit/?id=9ea7340ac4a909b36eb015121c06877af5aa24ce
Are those aarch64 builds performed at arm.koji.fedoraproject.org?
Is there any cli? Can you verify if gpaw builds are fine now?

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-17 20:41:27 UTC
Scratch builds of -18 succeed on aarch64.  Please build and update for Fedora and epel7.

Comment 4 marcindulak 2015-12-18 17:55:28 UTC
I'm not familiar with this particular koji platform. What is "-18"?
I've commited the change to Rawhide, Fedora 22/23, el6 and epel7,
because I always try to keep the spec file in sync.
Will a "standard" fedpkg update trigger also those aarch64 builds?

Comment 5 Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-18 17:56:57 UTC
(In reply to marcindulak from comment #4)
> I'm not familiar with this particular koji platform. What is "-18"?

gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18

> I've commited the change to Rawhide, Fedora 22/23, el6 and epel7,
> because I always try to keep the spec file in sync.
> Will a "standard" fedpkg update trigger also those aarch64 builds?

Yes.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 13:19:22 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6b7f39aa8e

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 13:30:35 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c9c02fba95

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 13:31:08 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606dd7afae

Comment 9 marcindulak 2016-01-04 13:43:26 UTC
gpaw epel7 build fails now because CentOS started to build also on ppc64le
and openblas is still missing there bug #1287105

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 20:20:19 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6b7f39aa8e

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 20:51:54 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606dd7afae

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-01-04 20:53:13 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c9c02fba95

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-01-24 01:59:34 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2016-01-24 03:18:33 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2016-01-24 03:33:24 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-18.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2016-02-13 20:47:19 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-21.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b736608e12

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2016-02-15 03:52:58 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-21.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b736608e12

Comment 18 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 14:08:40 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2016-03-09 14:28:05 UTC
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-21.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.