Bug 1291425
Summary: | xembedsniproxy: (RFE) restartable systemd-user service | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Raman Gupta <rocketraman> |
Component: | plasma-workspace | Assignee: | KDE SIG <kde-sig> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jgrulich, kde-sig, ltinkl, me, rdieter, than |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-03-07 04:25:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Raman Gupta
2015-12-14 20:47:58 UTC
It's probably running, but then crashing. Can you try starting it by hand? Works fine if I start it by hand. I'm not seeing anything that looks relevant in .xsession-errors re. a crash. Ok, I just found some errors in /var/log/messages. Looks like it is segfaulting on startup. I don't know why it works when run manually (via a krunner input) vs when run automatically by KDE. Dec 14 13:44:50 edison audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 pid=4580 comm="xembedsniproxy" exe="/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy" sig=11 Dec 14 13:44:50 edison kernel: xembedsniproxy[4580]: segfault at 10 ip 000055f63708ab05 sp 00007ffe7d5f4e90 error 4 in xembedsniproxy[55f63707c000+16000] Dec 14 14:41:44 edison audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 pid=12706 comm="xembedsniproxy" exe="/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy" sig=11 Dec 14 14:41:44 edison kernel: xembedsniproxy[12706]: segfault at 10 ip 000055b78638eb05 sp 00007ffe1b11a8e0 error 4 in xembedsniproxy[55b786380000+16000] Dec 14 14:49:49 edison audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=5 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 pid=14627 comm="xembedsniproxy" exe="/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy" sig=11 Dec 14 14:49:49 edison kernel: xembedsniproxy[14627]: segfault at 10 ip 00005555ad680b05 sp 00007ffc0d8fdd70 error 4 in xembedsniproxy[5555ad672000+16000] Dec 14 15:08:19 edison audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=6 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 pid=19758 comm="xembedsniproxy" exe="/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy" sig=11 Dec 14 15:08:19 edison kernel: xembedsniproxy[19758]: segfault at 10 ip 000055ea6f4e8b05 sp 00007fff682cc2d0 error 4 in xembedsniproxy[55ea6f4da000+16000] Dec 14 15:39:58 edison audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=9 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 pid=30931 comm="xembedsniproxy" exe="/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy" sig=11 Dec 14 15:39:58 edison kernel: xembedsniproxy[30931]: segfault at 10 ip 000055ffaf24db05 sp 00007ffce9a7ae80 error 4 in xembedsniproxy[55ffaf23f000+16000] Could it be this bug? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355463 Note that xembedsniproxy crashes quite a lot -- it just randomly crashed on me again. I just set it up as a systemd user unit with a Restart directive which should work nicely: ~ cat .config/systemd/user/xembedsniproxy.service [Unit] Description=xembed SNI proxy daemon [Service] ExecStart=/usr/bin/xembedsniproxy Restart=on-failure [Install] WantedBy=graphical.target Since this SNI proxy should (theoretically) be temporary, perhaps rather than attempting to debug issues in this software, the Fedora packaging for this could do something similar with a system-level user service configured in /usr/lib/systemd/user/xembedsniproxy.service? I believe all known-crashers should be addressed in plasma-5.5.4 release, but we can still consider adding a user service in the future. I haven't had any issues with xembedsniproxy recently, so I'll go ahead and close this. |