Bug 1293042

Summary: [virtio-win][vioser] Extra '-' (dash) in serial driver name
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Ladi Prosek <lprosek>
Component: virtio-winAssignee: Ladi Prosek <lprosek>
virtio-win sub component: virtio-win-prewhql QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: low    
Priority: unspecified CC: lmiksik, vrozenfe, wyu
Version: 7.3   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
NO_DOCS
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 08:49:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ladi Prosek 2015-12-19 15:26:48 UTC
Description of problem:
The name of the serial driver is not consistent with the rest of virtio-win.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install drivers
2. Open Device Manager, look at device names

Actual results:
VirtIO-Serial Driver

Expected results:
VirtIO Serial Driver

Additional info:

Comment 3 Yu Wang 2016-03-23 08:02:42 UTC
Reproduced this issue on virtio-win-prewhql-112 version
Verified this issue on virtio-win-prewhql-115 version
  
Steps same as comment#0

Actual Results:

on virtio-win-prewhql-112 (un-fixed version), the issue can be reproduced as comment#0
on virtio-win-prewhql-115 (fix version), Open Device Manager,device names is "VirtIO Serial Driver"
  
Base on above, this issue has been fixed already.

Thanks
wyu

Comment 4 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 22:57:02 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions

Comment 5 Ladi Prosek 2016-05-23 08:58:30 UTC
Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!

Comment 6 Yu Wang 2016-05-23 09:37:45 UTC
(In reply to Ladi Prosek from comment #5)
> Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!

Verify this bug according comment#3

Thanks
wyu

Comment 7 Yu Wang 2016-05-23 09:39:33 UTC
(In reply to Ladi Prosek from comment #5)
> Yu Wang, based on comment #3 should this BZ have VERIFIED status? Thanks!

Hi,

I have verified this bug, but there is no "devel_ack" for this bug.

Thanks
wyu

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 08:49:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2609.html