Bug 1293160
| Summary: | Re-enable building on armv7hl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Tadej Janež <tadej.j> |
| Component: | pandoc | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel7 | CC: | haskell-devel, petersen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-04 17:14:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 804125 | ||
|
Description
Tadej Janež
2015-12-20 20:48:14 UTC
Erm you mean ppc64le? ;o) (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1) > Erm you mean ppc64le? ;o) Hmm... I'm quite certain that armv7hl is disabled, not ppc64le [1] ;-). For example, the latest EPEL 7 build from Dec 3, 2016 [2] has binaries for: - aarch64 - ppc64 - ppc64le - x86_64 Only armv7hl is missing. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/pandoc.git/tree/pandoc.spec?h=epel7&id=89c925480d9817bf1e53a22980237e631b76a563#n58 [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=822278 I mean there is no armv7hl for EPEL7 in koji :) but are you building it somewhere else? Jens, (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > I mean there is no armv7hl for EPEL7 in koji :) you are right, there is no armv7hl for EPEL7 in koji :). Sorry about the confusion. |