Bug 129358

Summary:	Update dhcpd to 3.0.1 for RHEL3 UPD3
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3	Reporter:	nathan r. hruby <nhruby>
Component:	dhcp	Assignee:	Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	initscripts-7.60	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-08-09 22:07:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description nathan r. hruby 2004-08-06 20:45:30 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040615 Firefox/0.9

Description of problem:
Hi,

Now that DHCP 3.0.1 is gold, please consider upgrading the version in
RHEL3 as part of the next quaterly update cycle.

Thanks!

-n

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
See Description

Actual Results:  See Description

Expected Results:  See Description

Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2004-08-07 15:45:15 UTC

I agree totaly with you, also this should be a easy thing to do, 
because a simple rebuild at RHEL3 does it...easyfix :)

Comment 2 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-09 15:05:14 UTC

 
 The upgrade of DHCP to 3.0.1 in RHEL-3.0E-U3 has been rejected
 by product management.

 It is now in Fedora 3+, and will be in RHEL-4, and I
 have compiled it for RHEL-3.0-U3. The RPMS are available 
 here: 
    http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/DHCP/RHEL-3/3.0.1-EL_1/
 but their use will not be supported by Red Hat.

Comment 3 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-09 22:06:16 UTC

 On further investigation, it appears this "initscripts" bug was
 fixed and is working in FC3 (rawhide).
 initscripts: 7.60 +
 dhcp:        3.0.1

Comment 4 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-09 22:54:08 UTC

Sorry - previous comment was for wrong bug - please ignore!

Comment 5 John Flanagan 2004-12-21 19:41:52 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-566.html