Bug 1293818

Summary:	External SaaS Provider examples are completely incorrect
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Alexander Koksharov <akokshar>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Ashley Hardin <ahardin>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority:	low
Version:	3.1.0	CC:	akokshar, aos-bugs, jkaur, jokerman, mmccomas, pep, vigoyal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-02-15 15:55:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexander Koksharov 2015-12-23 07:13:00 UTC

Document URL: 
https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.0/dev_guide/integrating_external_services.html#external-saas-provider

Section Number and Name: 
Step 1 and 2

Describe the issue: 
- ports do not match in example in step 1 to the example in step 2
- example in step to is completely wrong. Syntax used is not in apiVersion v1 specification.

Suggestions for improvement: 
correct errors

Additional information:

Comment 1 Ashley Hardin 2016-01-19 20:34:16 UTC

@Alexander, thanks for your comments. I can go ahead and update the port numbers, but I am not familiar with the syntax used here. Can you please be more specific about how I can update the examples to align with apiVersion v1 specification? Thanks again!

Comment 4 Ashley Hardin 2016-02-15 15:55:20 UTC

Content is published:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/openshift-enterprise/version-3.1/developer-guide/#integrating-external-services

https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.1/dev_guide/integrating_external_services.html#external-mysql-database

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:15:19 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days