Bug 1295867
Summary: | [RFE] v2v: Warn when imported VM MAC address is not within oVirt DC MAC address pool range. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Nisim Simsolo <nsimsolo> |
Component: | RFEs | Assignee: | Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Gil Klein <gklein> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | --- | CC: | bugs, gklein, lsurette, mgoldboi, nsimsolo, rbalakri, yeylon, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.0.0-alpha | Flags: | mgoldboi:
ovirt-3.6.z?
mgoldboi: ovirt-4.0.0? mgoldboi: planning_ack+ rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack? |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-04-04 06:42:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Virt | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1209795, 1226206, 1362589 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Nisim Simsolo
2016-01-05 16:09:16 UTC
I'm honestly not sure I'd like that. The MAC is recorded in multiple places within the VM (for example, Windows activation relies on it, or in Linux in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files). It'll cause mess in the network configuration. Yaniv D. - thoughts? (In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1) > I'm honestly not sure I'd like that. The MAC is recorded in multiple places > within the VM (for example, Windows activation relies on it, or in Linux in > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files). It'll cause mess in the > network configuration. > > Yaniv D. - thoughts? We should consider doing a soft enforcement as default since there is now several times we hit this issue. See suggested RFE #1209795 from customer to highlight a VM based on this. if we do bug 1209795 we don't imho need any extra action for v2v. It is kind of expected that you want to do further changes once v2v finishes, eg. for stuff specific to oVirt not present in original environment I'm proposing to close this as addressed by bug 1209795 (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #3) > if we do bug 1209795 we don't imho need any extra action for v2v. It is kind > of expected that you want to do further changes once v2v finishes, eg. for > stuff specific to oVirt not present in original environment > > I'm proposing to close this as addressed by bug 1209795 keeping this one open for verification reasons for this use case. bug 1209795 should indeed take care of this use case. I think it's best to copy the case to the dependent bug. I don't see a reason to leave this one around, without any action *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1209795 *** |