Bug 1296293

Summary: Home page for business central depicts feature that isn't included in product
Product: [Retired] JBoss BRMS Platform 6 Reporter: Rich Lucente <rlucente>
Component: Business CentralAssignee: manstis
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Jiri Locker <jlocker>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.0CC: manstis, trikkola
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 19:40:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot of business central home page none

Description Rich Lucente 2016-01-06 20:05:04 UTC
Created attachment 1112241 [details]
screenshot of business central home page

Description of problem:

The home page for business central, see attached screenshot, depicts a test analysis function with percentage of rules tested and percentage of successful tests.  The goal is to show a developer/analyst whether there are a sufficient set of test cases for the rules.  However, no such feature can be found in the product.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.2.0 but probably going back to 6.0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Go to home page for business central
2.  Click on Analysis tab
3.  Marvel at the cool feature of analyzing test coverage for rules
4.  Cry because that feature isn't in the product

Actual results:
Feature is shown on home page but not in product

Expected results:
An actual test coverage tool as depicted in the home page graphic

Additional info:

Comment 2 manstis 2016-01-07 08:36:14 UTC
Hi Joe,

Can you please liaise with Toni about what is (Test Scenario) features are supported and generate some new screen shots accordingly.

Thanks,

Mike