| Summary: | Guest should failed to boot if set iops,bps to negative number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Qianqian Zhu <qizhu> |
| Component: | qemu-kvm-rhev | Assignee: | Fam Zheng <famz> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Gu Nini <ngu> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 7.3 | CC: | chayang, famz, juzhang, knoel, mrezanin, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | QEMU 2.6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-07 20:54:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Qianqian Zhu
2016-01-11 09:18:21 UTC
I see Fam submitted patches upstream. They will probably be accepted and we'll get the fix via rebase. Otherwise, I wonder if this issue is hit via libvirt (direct usage of QEMU/QMP is not supported). Upstream commit:
commit 972606c4db826f286f7f475551180502859f49b9
Author: Fam Zheng <famz>
Date: Wed Jan 20 12:21:20 2016 +0800
blockdev: Error out on negative throttling option values
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions Verify the bug on following sw versions: Kernel: 3.10.0-489.el7.x86_64 Qemu-kvm-rhev: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-20.el7.x86_64 Now once set negative number for FOO/FOO_max, the guest could not boot up and there is following prompt: qemu-kvm: -drive id=drive_image2,if=none,snapshot=off,aio=native,cache=none,format=qcow2,file=/home/hd1,bps=-512000,bps_max=1024000,throttling.bps-total-max-length=5: bps/iops/max values must be within [0, 1000000000000000] Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2673.html |