Bug 1298111
| Summary: | Fix sparse-file-self-heal.t and remove from bad tests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
| Component: | replicate | Assignee: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | mainline | CC: | bugs, rtalur | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.8rc2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1300210 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-16 13:54:41 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1300210 | |||
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13233 (tests: Fix sparse-file-self-heal.t) posted (#1) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13233 (tests: Fix sparse-file-self-heal.t) posted (#2) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13233 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit 6d430b85a39784f96b69368e1a9c8b4be4d0ddb1 Author: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Date: Wed Jan 13 14:37:30 2016 +0530 tests: Fix sparse-file-self-heal.t Psuedo Problem: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16682/consoleFull The 'zeroedfile' disk usage comparision which is failing in this .t file fails so only on XFS. The test passes when the backend is on a s̶a̶n̶e̶r̶ different filesystem like EXT4 or BTRFS. This is due to the speculative preallocation in XFS which can reserve different disk space on different XFS mounts for the same version and same file operation. See BZ 1277992 for an example of XFS behaviour. Fix: Don't compare the disk usage of the file on the bricks of the replica: instead, check that the disk space consumed is atleast equal to the size of the file. Also remove sparse-file-self-heal.t from is_bad_test() Change-Id: If43f59549136ebf91f17ff9d958954b3587afe56 BUG: 1298111 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13233 Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> "tests" component is for tests framework only. File a bug under test component if you find a bug in 1. any of the *.rc files under tests/ 2. run-tests.sh For everything else, the bug should be filed on 1. component which is being tested by .t file if the .t file requires fix. 2. component which is causing a valid .t file to fail in regression. I have used my best judgement here to move the bug to right component. In case of ambiguity, I have placed the blame on the .t file component. Please consider test bugs under the same backlog list that tracks other bugs in your component. This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user |
Description of problem: Psuedo Problem: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16682/consoleFull The 'zeroedfile' disk usage comparision which is failing in this .t file fails so only on XFS. The test passes when the backend is on a s̶a̶n̶e̶r̶ different filesystem like EXT4 or BTRFS. This is due to the speculative preallocation in XFS which can reserve different disk space on different XFS mounts for the same version and same file operation. See BZ 1277992 for an example of XFS behaviour. Fix: Don't compare the disk usage of the file on the bricks of the replica: instead, check that the disk space consumed is atleast equal to the size of the file. Also remove sparse-file-self-heal.t from is_bad_test()