Bug 1299409

Summary: OSD processes doesn't have a PID and hence sysvinit fails to restart the OSD processes
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vimal Kumar <vikumar>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Kefu Chai <kchai>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Bara Ancincova <bancinco>
Priority: high    
Version: 1.3.0CC: amaredia, ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, flucifre, hnallurv, icolle, kchai, kdreyer, ksquizza, natrived, nlevine, sjust, skinjo, sweil, tcole, vikumar
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 1.3.3   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-0.94.7-5.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_0.94.7-3redhat1trusty Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.OSDs now obtain PID files properly during an upgrade After upgrading from Red Hat Ceph Storage 1.2 to 1.3, some of the OSD daemons did not obtain PID files properly. As a consequence, such OSDs could not be restarted or stopped by using SysVinit commands and therefore could not be upgraded to the newer version. This update ensures that OSDs obtain PID files properly during an upgrade. As a result, OSDs are upgraded to newer versions as expected.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-29 12:55:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1335269    
Bug Blocks: 1228385, 1319075, 1372735    

Comment 2 Kefu Chai 2016-01-20 13:25:55 UTC
sounds like http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13422 .

Comment 7 Kefu Chai 2016-02-01 05:15:22 UTC
*** Bug 1267035 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Neil Levine 2016-02-05 19:25:15 UTC
*** Bug 1236693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Kefu Chai 2016-03-21 09:07:10 UTC
the hammer backport was merged.

Comment 20 RHEL Program Management 2016-04-28 03:15:21 UTC
Product Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 32 errata-xmlrpc 2016-09-29 12:55:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1972.html