Bug 1299908
Summary: | The default multi-user.target configured in rhel7.1 images runs /usr/bin/rhsmcertd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Frantisek Kluknavsky <fkluknav> |
Component: | rhel-server-container | Assignee: | Frantisek Kluknavsky <fkluknav> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | atomic-bugs <atomic-bugs> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | atomic-bugs, fkluknav, jpazdziora, mjenner, vpavlin |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1201663 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-02-16 13:53:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Frantisek Kluknavsky
2016-01-19 14:17:08 UTC
How is this bugzilla different from bug 1201663, in purpose and such? The same bug. One bugzilla is for a short-term not-so-nice solution. Second bugzilla for later when a clean desired solution becomes possible, waiting for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209382 It is awkward. Could you give me a hint how to properly solve such situations? We want both changes tested by QA. Verified /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/rhsmcertd.service no longer exists in test image built on registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhel7.2:7.2-43 From within the built test container I can confirm [root@6cd7fa38e3e3 /]# systemctl is-enabled rhsmcertd.service disabled Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0223.html |