Bug 1300354

Summary: blktrace manpage still contains undocumented internal option -k
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Jaroslav Aster <jaster>
Component: blktraceAssignee: Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Karel Srot <ksrot>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: blktrace-1.0.5-8.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1300353 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 07:41:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Jaroslav Aster 2016-01-20 14:31:38 UTC
The same issue on rhel-7.

# rpm -q blktrace
blktrace-1.0.5-6.el7.x86_64

# man blktrace | col -b | grep -- '-k'
       blktrace -d dev [ -r debugfs_path ] [ -o output ] [-k ] [ -w time ] [ -a action ] [ -A action_mask ] [ -v ]


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1300353 +++

Description of problem:

blktrace manpage still contains undocumented internal option -k. Option -k/--kill was removed in version 1.0.1-4 as undocumented internal option, but the removal was not complete properly. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583624#c26.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

blktrace-1.0.1-7.el6

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

# man blktrace | col -b | grep -- '-k'
       blktrace  -d  dev [ -r debugfs_path ] [ -o output ] [-k ] [ -w time ] [

Actual results:

There is -k option in blktrace manpage.

Expected results:

There is no -k option in blktrace manpage.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 07:41:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2499.html