Bug 1300368
Summary: | [Docs] 404 Not found at 90.4% of RHELOSP install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Quickstart Cloud Installer | Reporter: | Thom Carlin <tcarlin> |
Component: | doc-Release_Notes | Assignee: | rhci-docs |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 1.0 | CC: | bthurber, jlabocki, jmatthew, jmontleo, juwu, tcarlin |
Target Milestone: | TP3 | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | 1.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
Invalid characters will cause a deployment to fail.
In this example a "+" was used in the deployment name.
Consequence:
Computed values in the deployment are based on the deployment name, when invalid characters are present the deployment will break.
Fix:
Limit the characters in a deployment name not be alphanumeric only, "a" through "z", and "0" to "9", no other symbols.
Result:
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-04-08 00:25:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Thom Carlin
2016-01-20 15:14:07 UTC
/opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/excon-0.38.0/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:10:in `response_call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/excon-0.38.0/lib/excon/middlewares/response_parser.rb:26:in `response_call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/docker-api-1.17.0/lib/excon/middlewares/hijack.rb:45:in `response_call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/excon-0.38.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:402:in `response' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/excon-0.38.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:272:in `request' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fog-core-1.24.0/lib/fog/core/connection.rb:64:in `request' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fog-1.24.0/lib/fog/openstack/identity.rb:222:in `request' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fog-1.24.0/lib/fog/openstack/requests/identity/get_tenants_by_name.rb:9:in `get_tenants_by_name' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fusor_server-0.0.1/app/lib/actions/fusor/deployment/openstack/overcloud_configuration.rb:67:in `configure_networks' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fusor_server-0.0.1/app/lib/actions/fusor/deployment/openstack/overcloud_configuration.rb:40:in `run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:487:in `block (3 levels) in execute_run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:26:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:26:in `pass' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware.rb:16:in `pass' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action/progress.rb:30:in `with_progress_calculation' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action/progress.rb:16:in `run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:22:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:26:in `pass' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware.rb:16:in `pass' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-2.2.0.73/app/lib/actions/middleware/keep_locale.rb:23:in `block in run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-2.2.0.73/app/lib/actions/middleware/keep_locale.rb:34:in `with_locale' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-2.2.0.73/app/lib/actions/middleware/keep_locale.rb:23:in `run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:22:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/middleware/world.rb:30:in `execute' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:486:in `block (2 levels) in execute_run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:485:in `catch' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:485:in `block in execute_run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:402:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:402:in `block in with_error_handling' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:402:in `catch' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:402:in `with_error_handling' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:480:in `execute_run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/action.rb:262:in `execute' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract_flow_step.rb:9:in `block (2 levels) in execute' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract.rb:155:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract.rb:155:in `with_meta_calculation' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract_flow_step.rb:8:in `block in execute' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract_flow_step.rb:22:in `open_action' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/execution_plan/steps/abstract_flow_step.rb:7:in `execute' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/executors/parallel/worker.rb:20:in `block in on_message' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:859:in `block in assigns' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:858:in `tap' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:858:in `assigns' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:138:in `match_value' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:116:in `block in match' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:115:in `each' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/algebrick-0.4.0/lib/algebrick.rb:115:in `match' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/executors/parallel/worker.rb:17:in `on_message' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:82:in `on_envelope' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:72:in `receive' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:99:in `block (2 levels) in run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:99:in `loop' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:99:in `block in run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:99:in `catch' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:99:in `run' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-0.7.7.9/lib/dynflow/micro_actor.rb:13:in `block in initialize' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/logging-1.8.1/lib/logging/diagnostic_context.rb:323:in `call' /opt/rh/ruby193/root/usr/share/gems/gems/logging-1.8.1/lib/logging/diagnostic_context.rb:323:in `block in create_with_logging_context' Can you provide redacted ouput, in a private comment if you're concerned, and get the traceback from the top, please unredacted output that is. Provided privately After discussion, we believe this is due to a plus sign (+) in the deployment name. https://github.com/fusor/fusor/pull/631 will in part address this; we'll have to start using label instead of name once it is merged. Hi John, In addition to adding the known issue to the Release Notes, I think in the deployment procedure, we should also tell users to limit the deployment name to only alphabets and numbers. Is that correct? Cheers, Julie Julie, After this BZ was filed we ended up fixing the underlying issue, so the use of "+" or non-standard characters in the deployment name is not breaking a CFME on OSP deployment. I'd recommend verifying with QE that this is no longer an issue, then let's drop this from the release notes. Yes, this is no longer an issue |