Bug 1300452
| Summary: | When deploying the undercloud and overcloud with an SSL certificate that contains subjectAltNames, the deployment fails | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Dan Yasny <dyasny> |
| Component: | documentation | Assignee: | RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | adahms, athomas, hbrock, jcoufal, josorior, mburns, mcornea, rhel-osp-director-maint, sasha, srevivo |
| Target Milestone: | y3 | Keywords: | Documentation, Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 7.0 (Kilo) | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-17 12:30:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dan Yasny
2016-01-20 21:01:48 UTC
I don't believe this should be a blocker for 7.3. First, it's a problem that has existed since 7.0 and this is the first report I've heard. Second, it doesn't appear to be a problem with how we're configuring anything. It appears to be an issue in the libraries that the OpenStack clients use to implement ssl connectivity, and it's outside our control whether we could get those fixed for 7.3. Third, we don't document deploying with subjectAltName for other reasons, so this is only a problem for people who aren't following our recommended configuration. With all that said, we should fix it because it does appear to be incorrect behavior but I wouldn't hold up a release for it. We should document the fact that using a self-signed cert an depend on also using a (potentially self-signed) CA. I don't think this is actually a blocker, but on the other hand, seems to me that it's mostly a validation issue. I did get this error when using a self-signed certificate with subjectAltNames, However, it worked if the certificate with subjectAltNames was not self-signed, but signed by a CA cert. That CA cert could even be self-signed; It doesn't necessarily need to be signed by a trusted CA. I think what this needs instead is just documentation stating this. Moving to 'NEW' while assigned to the default assignee. OSP 7 has reached its retirement, please see https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2362 |