Bug 1300578

Summary: Review Request: vim-ack - Run ack search tool from Vim
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yanis Guenane <yguenane>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: hguemar, mrunge, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-31 00:46:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 177841, 201449    

Description Yanis Guenane 2016-01-21 08:20:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack.spec
SRPM URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack-1.0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12631325

Description:
Run your favorite search tool from Vim, with an enhanced results list.

This plugin was designed as a Vim frontend for the Perl module App::Ack.
Ack can be used as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep.
The plugin allows you to run ack from Vim, and shows the results in a split window.

Fedora Account System Username: spredzy

Notes:

  * Not yet in the packager group but I am sponsored (ie. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298517)

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-29 08:28:17 UTC
spredzy's scratch build of vim-ack-1.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12721292

Comment 2 Yanis Guenane 2016-01-29 08:31:31 UTC
Initially this package was built packaging the 1.0.8 version of this software.
This version was lacking a LICENSE file and the license was added in the spec file. A bug had been opened upstream[1] to add this file, which the owner of the project did and released a 1.0.9 version with the LICENSE included.

Those are the links for the 1.0.9 (latest):

Spec URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack.spec
SRPM URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack-1.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12721292


Those are the links for the 1.0.8 to compare:

Spec URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack_1.0.8.spec
SRPM URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack-1.0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12631325


[1] https://github.com/mileszs/ack.vim/issues/172

Comment 3 hguemar 2016-02-24 10:40:29 UTC
One major issue, your package owns directories owned by vim-filesystem, just name files/directories inside these directories instead:
%{vimfiles_root}/plugin/                  
%{vimfiles_root}/autoload/                                                  %{vimfiles_root}/ftplugin/

According guidelines, your specfile should be named vim-ack.spec. It's minor issue, but it breaks automated reviewing tools.

Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-02-24 13:20:32 UTC
spredzy's scratch build of vim-ack-1.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13114318

Comment 5 Yanis Guenane 2016-02-24 13:29:26 UTC
@Haïkel

Thank you for pointing #1. It has been fixed and a new spec file has been uploaded at the same place.

For #2, I am reposting the link here in order to be caugh by fedora-review

Spec URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack.spec
SRPM URL: https://pub.yanisguenane.fr/fedora/packaging/vim-ack/vim-ack-1.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 6 Package Review 2021-05-01 00:45:31 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 7 Package Review 2021-05-31 00:46:01 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.