Bug 1300650

Summary: RFE: postgis in software collections?
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Frank Büttner <bugzilla>
Component: postgisAssignee: Devrim Gündüz <devrim>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: admiller, devrim, dkelson, hhorak, jmlich83, mnagy, pkajaba, praiskup
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-04 15:42:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Frank Büttner 2016-01-21 11:07:07 UTC 
Description of problem:
it is possible to release this module for rh-postgresql94?
Because postgresql94 can be installed for CentOS and RHEL via the SCL.
Comment 1 Pavel Raiskup 2016-01-22 09:11:50 UTC 
Frank, thanks for the report.  This is not trivial task (dependencies,
packaging), and making this for rh-postgresq94 unlikely, more likely against
future collections.  Also note that requests for new package in official
software collections should be done through Red Hat support channels, see:
https://www.redhat.com/support/process/production/#howto

This is valid RFE at least for community collections -- I'll keep this open
for discussion/research notes.
Comment 2 Honza Horak 2016-02-04 15:42:19 UTC 
I think we can close this as duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300650.

What we can do with community help though (I can provide necessary guidance, stop by to discuss at sclorg ML if you're willing to help) is creating another SCL (say sclo-postgis) that would not be necessarily part of RHSCL offering, but would be available for RHEL and CentOS users in the CentOS SCLo repositories.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1008506 ***