Bug 1301231

Summary:	[doc] Satellite 5 repository hosting documentation
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Federico Lucifredi <flucifre>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Bara Ancincova <bancinco>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.3.2	CC:	asriram, hnallurv, hyelloji, kdreyer, ngoswami
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Documentation, ZStream
Target Release:	1.3.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.Red Hat Satellite 5 and Red Hat Ceph Storage integration Red Hat Ceph Storage nodes can be connected to the Red Hat Satellite 5 Server. The server then hosts package repositories and provides system updates. Once you register your Ceph nodes with the Satellite 5 server, you can deliver upgrades to the Ceph cluster without allowing a direct connection to the Internet, as well as search and view errata applicable to the cluster nodes. To learn more, see the https://access.redhat.com/articles/2139421[How to Register Ceph with Satellite 5] article on the Red Hat Customer Portal.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-03-01 08:23:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1299303

Description Federico Lucifredi 2016-01-22 22:44:29 UTC

Description of problem:

rel-eng is in the process of creating RHN repositories for Ceph 1.3. We will need to add to our existing Satellite 6 doc a second document (do not mix the two!) detailing the same process, but in a Satellite 5/RHN world, as opposed to Satellite6/CDN.

Please note that delivery of this is decoupled from 1.3.2 — it will ship as soon as release engineering gives us the go ahead.

Comment 2 Federico Lucifredi 2016-01-22 22:52:47 UTC

This is one of two late-breaking doc bugs. Anjana has been informed.

Comment 5 Hemanth Kumar 2016-02-29 16:22:26 UTC

There were couple of changes in the Doc
Discussed with Bara and got it fixed..
Article looks good now.. Moving to Verified state