| Summary: | Repo syncs resulting in PLP0000: Importer indicated a failed response do not index successfully obtained packages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Craig Donnelly <cdonnell> |
| Component: | Repositories | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.1.6 | CC: | bbuckingham, chrobert, jsherril, ktordeur, mhrivnak, riehecky |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-04 18:01:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Craig Donnelly
2016-01-25 21:11:47 UTC
This bug may relate to these two fixes that were implemented into Satellite 6: https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5680 https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5567 Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog. Brad, I think the component for this should not be Pulp. Perhaps you can find a better one for it? I'm changing the component since the issue appears to be with how and when katello queries pulp. Let me know if there's anything to be done on the pulp side for this. Justin, with the changes that have gone in to Satellite 6.2, would the described behavior still exist? I believe this behavior still exists. What works now on (some time before 6.2.6) is that re-syncing will properly re-index the content even if nothing changed on the 2nd sync. We might have to think about this a bit, lets say I sync a repo and it syncs some of the rpms, but not all. Does the metadata for that repo get generated? Should it? If it doesn't get generated (and thus the client will not see the new rpms), should we index them? (In reply to Justin Sherrill from comment #6) > We might have to think about this a bit, lets say I sync a repo and it syncs > some of the rpms, but not all. Does the metadata for that repo get > generated? Should it? Yes it gets generated. Download errors are so common for yum repos that we just note the error in the task status, but the overall task succeeds, and a publish task gets queued as normal. You can know for sure if new metadata gets generated based on whether a publish task gets queued and succeeds. Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. |