| Summary: | Requesting template for systemd preset requests | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh> |
| Component: | Creating/Changing Bugs | Assignee: | Matt Tyson 🤬 <mtyson> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | huiwang, jmcdonal, mtahir, mtyson, qgong, sgallagh |
| Target Milestone: | 5.0 | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-05-17 04:11:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1337534 | ||
|
Description
Stephen Gallagher
2016-01-27 14:08:43 UTC
Also one additional question: * What is the exact name (or names) of the systemd unit files to be enabled? e.g. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review Which comes from extensions/RedHat/template/en/default/bug/create/create-fedora-review.html.tmpl I need a little bit more information For reference, If you look at the fedora review link in comment 2... What would you like in the "Review Summary" text box? Also, there's three other text strings. You can either provide replacements for them, or, if they are not needed I can remove them. > With this template, you can create a package review request according to the Package Review Process. > Help: Brief description of new package. Ex: Review Request: foogrokker - Universal parser library > Help: Package information and more detailed description of function the new package performs. Review Summary: systemd presets request - <list of systemd units> "With this template, you can request that one or more systemd unit files be enabled by default in Fedora." Help: Description of units to enable. Ex: systemd presets request: foo.socket foo.service (drop the second help, I think). Remaining text: * Does the service require post-rpm-installation configuration in order to be useful (for example, does it need manual edits to a configuration file)? * Does the service listen on a network socket for connections originating on a separate physical or virtual machine? * Is the service non-persistent (i.e. run once at startup and exit)? * Is this request for all Fedora deliverables or only for some Editions (list them)? When this is in production the URL will be: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-systemd-request Verified this issue in QE instance. Version: rh-bugzilla-4.4.11050-4.el6.noarch The result is PASS. This is marked as VERIFIED but not pushed to production. Is there a schedule for that? (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #7) > This is marked as VERIFIED but not pushed to production. Is there a schedule > for that? It should be put into production in the next two weeks. Keep an eye out for an outage banner once this bug enters RELEASE_PENDING state. This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this bug. Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug. |