| Summary: | Discrepancy in Repository Naming Conventions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Chris Jenkins <cjenkins> |
| Component: | Hammer - Content | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.1.6 | CC: | bkearney, dgupte, tstrachota |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-04 18:04:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog. Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. |
Description of problem: I've been looking at ways to create a 'clone' (note: not backup) of a Sat6 server. There is a Sat6 in one environment but I would like the same configuration (with a different Org + Locations) in a separate environment which has no direct network connectivity with the other apart from Sat6-A -> Local Desktop -> USB drive -> Laptop on network B -> Sat6-B. Hammer --csv is great for exporting details of all the required metadata but I've noticed that the naming convention for Repositories and Repository Sets are different. A worked example: On Sat6-A # hammer product list --organization-id=3 --enabled yes My "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server" has the product-id of 105. # hammer --csv repository list --product-id 105 --organization-id=3 > repoList.csv Shows: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server RPMs x86_64 7Server Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Extras RPMs x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server Kickstart x86_64 7Server Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Optional RPMs x86_64 7Server etc,etc I then copy repoList.csv over the Sat6-B If I then try to enable one of the repos on Sat6-B using: hammer repository-set enable --organization "${ORG}" \ --product "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server" \ --name "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server RPMs x86_64 7Server" \ --releasever "7Server" --basearch "x86_64" It fails because the correct name of the repo is "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server (RPMs)". There doesn't seem to be a neat way of getting the 'right' repo names from the ones outputed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1.* How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. See Above 2. 3. Actual results: See Above Expected results: See Above Additional info: Is it possible for hammer --csv repository list to output the same name as required for hammer repository-set enable ?